Academia Has Morally Failed


Dialogues #49

​Read in browser↗️​

"One of my biggest complaints is politically motivated selective demands for rigor…What passes for serious philosophy often in the best presses or the best journals is just not very good. And I don't think I say that just because I disagree with it. The standards get lower. Whereas among philosophers, if you're running into something more controversial, the standards go way up. And anyone who's tried to publish anything controversial has experienced it. That's one thing I wish philosophers were better at: applying consistent standards.” - Dr. Brandon Warmke

🚨Episode 17 of the podcast is out! 🚨

In my grad school days, I was able to see behind the curtain of academia. Some of it was encouraging, and a privilege to be a part of.

But a lot of it was very ugly.

I thought I was going to advance my knowledge of philosophy so I could eventually teach students some of the big questions that got me interested in philosophy in the first place. That sense of wonder and curiosity, and a toolbox that included critical thinking, argument rigor, precision, and clarity.

It quickly became clear that instead I needed to work 24/7 on my research, not on my teaching skills. To be successful (complete the program and have any hope of being employed), I needed to obsess over writing articles that get published in good academic journals.

That was an initial shock to the system.

But I also found out I needed to do the right kind of research. The kind of research that philosophy departments were looking for needed to include some kind of social justice angle. The job applications required me to write about how my philosophical work helped marginalized communities.

All this time I thought I was just trying to do a deep dive in metaphysics and language.

That was a second shock to the system.

I remember sitting in PhD seminars, listening to one side of the political aisle get celebrated while the other got demonized, and wondering why it was suddenly acceptable to throw high standards for argument and rigor out the window.

It was all packaged as ways to fight injustice against minorities or something, but the most conservative grad student in those seminars was a minority. Just not the right kind of minority, apparently.


Academia is in trouble. The public has lost trust in our academic institutions, and in many cases for good reason.

So I wanted to talk to Dr. Brandon Warmke, currently Associate Professor of Philosophy at Bowling Green State University, and starting this fall Associate Professor of Humanities at the Hamilton School of Classical and Civic Education at the University of Florida. Dr. Warmke has authored many articles and books, and has been a vocal critic of academia and its unethical ideology and practices.

We covered philosophers’ political double standards for rigor, ideological discrimination, ethical and unethical approaches to teaching controversial topics, the importance of forgiveness, and much more.

Can I ask you a favor?

It helps tremendously and takes only a second if you subscribe on YouTube.

​Take a look at this episode, or listen wherever you get your podcasts.

Until next time,

Jared


​

$5.00

Selling Plato's Tip Jar

Selling Plato's Academy courses, Selling Plato's Dialogues, and the podcast would not be possible without your ongoing... Read more

​

If you like listening to just audio in the car, on a run, or while you're supposed to be working, subscribe to the podcast so you never miss an episode:

If you like watching the conversation, subscribe, and the latest episode will show up in your feed. (Extra credit: like whatever videos you watch if you genuinely like what you're hearing.)

Take a sec to follow us on

X: https://x.com/sellingplato​

TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@selling.plato​

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/sellingplato/​

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sellingplato​

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sellingplato​

Threads: https://www.threads.net/@sellingplato​


🏛️ If you're ready to get started learning logic, I offer a low-cost, subscription-based course. You can try it free for a week and see what you think:


Selling Plato's Dialogues

If you think someone else will like Selling Plato's Dialogues, please share it with your friends and family!

If you received this email as a forward, click to subscribe!

​

​

113 Cherry St #92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2205
​Unsubscribe · Preferences​

Selling Plato

Scratch that philosophical itch with Selling Plato's Dialogues weekly. Read what philosophy has to offer you for daily living, and subscribe here so you never miss a post, an episode, or an opportunity to learn even more through a philosophy course 👇🏻

Read more from Selling Plato

Dialogues #56 Read in browser↗️ "My aim in this book is to defend the view that, when it comes to which highly visible objects there are right before our eyes, things are more or less the way they seem. There are tables, trees, trunks, dogs, and all manner of other ordinary objects, and there are no dog–trunk composites or other such extraordinary objects...Outsiders to the debates over the metaphysics of material objects will likely find my view so obvious as to hardly be worth stating. Let...

Dialogues #55 Read in browser↗️ "We can set aside the Rosetta Stone and just speak English to a computer. They will likely understand just as well as when speaking to them in Python. This immediately presents two choices: We can get lazy, or we can elevate our thought." - Marco Argenti “If you want to pursue a career in engineering, you should focus on learning philosophy in addition to traditional engineering coursework.” That’s Marco Argenti, the Chief Information Officer at Goldman Sachs,...

Dialogues #54 Read in browser↗️ "One of the most damaging and widespread social beliefs is the idea that most adults are incapable of learning new skills." - Naval Ravikant Congratulations to Joshua, who won a free year of my Introduction to Logic course in last week's one-year anniversary giveaway! I created the Introduction to Logic course because I think greater logic literacy would be a net good for society. But it isn't easy to capture those sweet mental gains that come from learning...