Do Hard Things


Dialogues #52

​Read in browser↗️​

​
"The magic you're looking for is in the work you're avoiding."
- Chris Williamson

Most days I ask myself this question somewhat skeptically:

What in the world does my discipline of philosophy have to offer?

It’s a question that tries to get at the core problem of how to make philosophy appealing.

The problem is not that people have no interest in ethical issues, to take one example.

You don’t have to look hard to see a flood of moral outrage through social media, identity politics, canceling, etc.

There are plenty of common points of interest between topics in philosophy and the average person going about their day.

I used to think that a solution to philosophy’s marketing problem was telling people, “Hey, you know that thing you seem to be interested in? Philosophers have written a lot about your thing!”

That news typically gets a tepid reaction at best.

It’s not that people don’t have a desire to learn; many people do have that desire.

But “learn” exhibits a process/product ambiguity: if I tell you I learned something, I could have in mind the product or outcome of learning, or I could have in mind the process of learning (or both). (I first learned about the process/product ambiguity while reading this paper from the philosophy of language, which you can download for free at the link.)

More specifically, many people have a desire to learn if we're referring to learning outcomes, apart from the necessary work that comes from the process.

Having this distinction in hand, I now have a better explanation for the gap between people’s desire to be rational, logical, clear, skilled at forming arguments, etc., and the hard things required to get there.

And that’s a universal problem we all face across almost every category in life.

We often want the outcomes without the process. A focus on the process, and the difficulties that comes with it, takes an entirely different mindset.

A few weeks ago, I wrote about the sought-after virtue of resilience. But I failed to recognize or remind myself that merely engaging with philosophy at any level takes a hefty dose of fortitude and resilience.

Philosophy is not easy, and it can often make you feel less than intelligent if you struggle to grasp what you're reading.

So maybe one way to market philosophy's appeal would be to actually lean in to its intrinsically difficult nature:

Do you want to be resilient? Check out philosophy and test yourself!

In my conversation with Nathan Howard, he gave what I thought was one of the best pitches for the value of studying philosophy. He said studying philosophy is like the intellectual equivalent of going to the gym.

It's like exercise for your mind, to keep you healthy.

You can easily find thousands of health books, podcasts, channels, etc. that emphasize physical resilience and overcoming the challenges that are inherent with fitness. It's an entire economy, industry, and subculture.

Maybe we've been missing an opportunity to apply those same principles to intellectual resilience and fortitude.

So if you're tempted to put aside that book or article because it seems a little too challenging, remember:

Do hard things.

The outcomes will follow.

Until next time.

Jared


This Week's Free Philosophy Resource:

Title: Manipulative Underspecification, forthcoming in Philosophical Review (a top-tier journal)

Author: Justin D'Ambrosio

Reading Level: Graduate level

Have you ever been listening to a politician talk and thought to yourself, "This person is saying words but is saying nothing whatsoever of substance"? The paper talks about underspecification as a means of achieving non-communicative goals. If you are interested in a more lay-level summary of the paper, he provides it here, where I first discovered the article.


​

P.S.


If you like listening to just audio in the car, on a run, or while you're supposed to be working, subscribe to the podcast so you never miss an episode:

If you like watching the conversation, subscribe, and the latest episode will show up in your feed. (Extra credit: like whatever videos you watch if you genuinely like what you're hearing.)

$5.00

Selling Plato's Tip Jar

Selling Plato's Academy courses, Selling Plato's Dialogues, and the podcast would not be possible without your ongoing... Read more

​

Take a sec to follow us on

X: https://x.com/sellingplato​

TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@selling.plato​

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/sellingplato/​

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sellingplato​

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sellingplato​

Threads: https://www.threads.net/@sellingplato​
​

🏛️ If you're ready to get started learning logic, I offer a low-cost, subscription-based course. You can try it free for a week and see what you think:


Selling Plato's Dialogues

If you think someone else will like this Dialogues newsletter, please forward it along to your friends and family!

If you received this email as a forward, click to subscribe!

​

​

113 Cherry St #92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2205
​Unsubscribe · Preferences​

Selling Plato

Scratch that philosophical itch with Selling Plato's Dialogues weekly. Read what philosophy has to offer you for daily living, and subscribe here so you never miss a post, an episode, or an opportunity to learn even more through a philosophy course 👇🏻

Read more from Selling Plato

Dialogues #56 Read in browser↗️ "My aim in this book is to defend the view that, when it comes to which highly visible objects there are right before our eyes, things are more or less the way they seem. There are tables, trees, trunks, dogs, and all manner of other ordinary objects, and there are no dog–trunk composites or other such extraordinary objects...Outsiders to the debates over the metaphysics of material objects will likely find my view so obvious as to hardly be worth stating. Let...

Dialogues #55 Read in browser↗️ "We can set aside the Rosetta Stone and just speak English to a computer. They will likely understand just as well as when speaking to them in Python. This immediately presents two choices: We can get lazy, or we can elevate our thought." - Marco Argenti “If you want to pursue a career in engineering, you should focus on learning philosophy in addition to traditional engineering coursework.” That’s Marco Argenti, the Chief Information Officer at Goldman Sachs,...

Dialogues #54 Read in browser↗️ "One of the most damaging and widespread social beliefs is the idea that most adults are incapable of learning new skills." - Naval Ravikant Congratulations to Joshua, who won a free year of my Introduction to Logic course in last week's one-year anniversary giveaway! I created the Introduction to Logic course because I think greater logic literacy would be a net good for society. But it isn't easy to capture those sweet mental gains that come from learning...